Infodeck vs eMaint
Continuous IoT monitoring meets reliability-centered maintenance. Compare two approaches to predictive maintenance.
Last updated: February 2026
Quick Decision Guide
Based on your needs, here is which platform may be the better fit.
Infodeck may be the better fit if you...
- Want to start today - add locations, assets, and go
- You want continuous 24/7 sensor monitoring
- You need open IoT protocols (LoRaWAN, AWS IoT)
- You manage smart buildings with HVAC, energy, environment sensors
- You need public request forms via QR codes
- You prefer vendor-agnostic sensor options
eMaint may be the better fit if you...
- You're already invested in Fluke equipment
- Reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) is your methodology
- You need deep MTTR/MTBF analysis and failure tracking
- Electrical maintenance and testing is a primary focus
- You prefer periodic professional-grade testing over continuous monitoring
See the difference at a glance
Key metrics that matter when choosing your CMMS platform
Implementation complexity
Per user pricing
Self-serve available
Sensor connectivity
Data collection approach
RCM methodology
Two Different Approaches
Continuous real-time monitoring vs periodic professional testing. Which philosophy fits your needs?
Infodeck: Continuous Monitoring
- Sensors report data 24/7 automatically
- Instant alerts when thresholds are breached
- Historical trend analysis and predictions
- Works with any LoRaWAN or IoT sensor
eMaint: Periodic Testing
- Technicians take scheduled measurements
- Fluke device data uploads to CMMS
- Professional-grade Fluke testing tools
- Strong for electrical and reliability testing
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Detailed breakdown of capabilities across both platforms.
Work Order Management
Asset Management
IoT & Sensors
Reliability Features
Reporting & Analytics
Pricing & Support
Honest Assessment
Every platform has strengths and limitations. Here is an objective look at both.
Infodeck
Strengths
- Native IoT with open protocols (LoRaWAN, AWS IoT)
- Continuous real-time sensor monitoring
- Data quality management for sensor validation
- Start same day - no lengthy implementation
- Public request forms via QR codes for easy work order intake
- Works with any sensor, not locked to one vendor
Limitations
- — No native Fluke Connect integration
- — RCM features less mature than eMaint
- — Newer platform vs established eMaint
eMaint
Strengths
- Backed by Fluke Corporation - strong reliability heritage
- Native Fluke Connect device integration
- Deep reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) features
- Strong MTTR/MTBF tracking and analysis
- Professional-grade electrical testing integration
Limitations
- — Limited to Fluke ecosystem for IoT integration
- — Periodic testing vs continuous monitoring
- — No LoRaWAN or open IoT protocol support
- — No public request forms for external users
- — Higher pricing for full feature set
Considering a switch?
If you're evaluating a move from any CMMS platform, our team provides complimentary migration planning.